Observational studyScientific reports2025
Determinants of delay in presentation to completion of treatment in cervical cancer.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Barriers to Accessing Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in the Amazon Region-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the time taken between onset of symptoms to consultation with health care provider to the diagnosis of cervical cancer to initiation of treatment and completion of treatment. Secondary outcome was to analyze the various factors associated with the delay. A prospective observational study was undertaken in a tertiary cancer center in North East India from 1st January 2023 to 31st December 2023. Time delay in presentation, diagnosis and treatment initiation and completion were studied and factors pertaining to the various delays were assessed. A total of 101 patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 51 years. The median delay in presentation, diagnosis, initiation and completion of treatment was 60 days, 7 days,28 days and 56 days respectively. The majority of women (77%) acknowledged they did not know abnormal vaginal bleeding was a red flag sign of cancer and none of them had undergone any screening test to detect cervical cancer. Sixty per cent of women had availed government insurance schemes. On univariate analysis, it was found age > 50 years, absence of prior gynaecology check-up, poor awareness and "quack" consultations have been associated with delayed presentation(p < 0.05). However, disease apprehension, people living below the poverty line and referral to higher diagnostic centers for advanced imaging were associated with delayed initiation and completion of treatment (p < 0.05). Increased awareness about cervical cancer, better percolation of cancer screening knowledge among public, improvement of diagnostic facilities and better utilization of insurance schemes are the need of the hour in this part of the country to keep the journey to the WHO 2030 goal of cervical cancer elimination running on time without any hassles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.