ArticleScientific reports2025
Patent protection of biological genetic resources based on deep learning and artificial intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning has provided new ideas for the patent protection of biological genetic resources in the field of intellectual property. This paper aims to explore the application of deep learning technology driven by artificial intelligence in the patent protection of biological genetic resources. By analyzing the advantages of deep learning models in extracting patent texts and technical features, the paper proposes a technical approach to optimize the patent protection of biological genetic resources. This paper constructs and optimizes a deep learning-based Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network (RCNN) model. It combines natural language processing techniques and image recognition algorithms to efficiently extract and analyze patent texts and technical features. The model's performance is further enhanced by introducing Top-K max pooling strategy and pre-trained word vectors (such as GloVe). Experimental results show that the optimized RCNN model performs excellently in classifying patents related to biological genetic resources. It achieves an overall accuracy of 90.20% and an F1 score of 89.00%. In subcategories such as agriculture, medicine, and biotechnology, the model's accuracy and F1 score both exceed 90%. Additionally, the use of Top-K max pooling strategy and pre-trained word vectors (GloVe) significantly improves the model's feature extraction ability and classification accuracy. The proposed optimized RCNN model demonstrates strong adaptability and efficiency in the field of patent protection for biological genetic resources. Compared with existing technologies, the optimized model not only improves the accuracy and efficiency of patent text classification but also reduces the time and cost of manual review through automated processing. The research results provide new technical support for the intellectual property protection of biological genetic resources and offer practical experience for the application of deep learning in the field of intellectual property.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.