ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi-scale CNN-GRU fusion model with stationary wavelet transform for 14-day ahead dam water level prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of SWT data decomposition in enhancing CNN-GRU early-, slow- and late fusion models for 14-day ahead water level prediction at the Klang Gates Dam. The impact of replacing CNN in the CNN-GRU fusion models with multi-scale CNN modules, was also investigated. Multivariate time series, including daily rainfall, evaporation, monthly water demand, ONI, SOI and DMI, were used together with daily water level time series. The results demonstrated that applying SWT to decompose daily water level, rainfall and evaporation data improved the performance of all CNN-GRU fusion models. Further ablation test showed that the decomposition of water level contributed the most improvement on the models. Meanwhile, utilizing multi-scale CNN module in CNN-GRU fusion models had also enhanced the model performance. Using three multi-scale CNN modules for multivariate feature input channel in the slow and late fusion model had improved the model performance further. The improvement was attributed to the ability of the multi-scale CNN modules in providing features with various kernel sizes. The CNN-GRU slow fusion model with multi-scale CNN modules trained with SWT decomposed dataset achieved the best performance, with NRMSE, NSE and MAPE of 0.4144, 0.7919 and 0.318, respectively, for the 14-day ahead prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.