Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271806›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Easy-access online social media metrics are associated with misinformation sharing activity.

Júlia Számely, Alessandro Galeazzi, Júlia Koltai, Elisa Omodei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Júlia SzámelyDepartment of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.
Alessandro GaleazziDepartment of Mathematics, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Júlia KoltaiMTA-TK Lendület "Momentum" Digital Social Science Research Group for Social Stratification, ELTE Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Elisa OmodeiDepartment of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria. omodeie@ceu.edu.

Funding

Hungarian Academy of Sciences Lendület Program LP2022-10/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Misinformation poses a significant challenge studied extensively by researchers, yet acquiring data to identify primary sharers is time-consuming and challenging. To address this, we propose a low-barrier approach to differentiate social media users who are more likely to share misinformation from those who are less likely. Leveraging insights from previous studies, we demonstrate that easy-access online social network metrics-average daily tweet count, and account age-can be leveraged to help identify potential low factuality content spreaders on X (previously known as Twitter). We find that higher tweet frequency is positively associated with low factuality in shared content, while account age is negatively associated with it. We also find that some of the effects differ depending on the number of accounts a user follows. Our findings show that relying on these easy-access social network metrics could serve as a low-barrier approach for initial identification of users who are more likely to spread misinformation, and therefore contribute to combating misinformation effectively on social media platforms.

Indexed as

CommunicationInformation DisseminationSocial MediaHumansSocial NetworkingCognitive loadDigital literacyMisinformationSocial considerationsSocial mediaX

Identifiers

PMID41271806
PMCPMC12638905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.