ArticleScientific data2025
The BRAINTEASER Datasets: Clinical, Wearable and Environmental Data for ALS & MS Progression Modeling.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are debilitating diseases with unpredictable progression. Artificial Intelligence-based tools for modelling disease progression could significantly improve the quality of life for patients and caregivers while supporting clinicians in delivering more personalized and timely care. However, the limited availability of data hinders the development, testing, and reproducibility of such predictive tools. To address this challenge, we curated, in the context of the H2020 BRAINTEASER project, four datasets containing clinical data from a total of 2,290 ALS patients and 723 MS patients. These datasets also include environmental data and information collected through wearable devices. Unlike most existing resources, the BRAINTEASER datasets are gathered from clinical practice, offering a more accurate representation of the data that an AI progression prediction tool would encounter in real-world scenarios. In addition to manual and automated data quality checks, the research community has validated the datasets through three editions of the intelligent Disease Progression Prediction challenges held within the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.