Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271784›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025

MarkerPredict: predicting clinically relevant predictive biomarkers with machine learning.

Daniel V Veres, Peter Csermely, Klára Schulc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel V VeresDepartment of Molecular Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Peter CsermelyDepartment of Molecular Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Klára SchulcDepartment of Molecular Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. schulc.klara@semmelweis.hu.

Funding

Development of Scientific Workshops for the Training of Doctors, Health Scientists and Pharmacists Programme EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009Thematic Excellence Programme TKP2021-EGA-24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision oncology relies on predictive biomarkers for selecting targeted cancer therapies. Network-based properties of proteins, together with structural features such as intrinsic disorder, are likely to shape their potential as biomarkers. We therefore designed a hypothesis-generating framework that integrates network motifs and protein disorder to explore their contribution to predictive biomarker discovery. This encouraged us to develop MarkerPredict by using literature evidence-based positive and negative training sets of 880 target-interacting protein pairs total with Random Forest and XGBoost machine learning models on three signalling networks. MarkerPredict classified 3670 target-neighbour pairs with 32 different models achieving a 0.7-0.96 LOOCV accuracy. We defined a Biomarker Probability Score (BPS) as a normalised summative rank of the models. The scores identified 2084 potential predictive biomarkers to targeted cancer therapeutics, 426 was classified as a biomarker by all 4 calculations. We detailed the biomarker potential of LCK and ERK1. This study encourages further validation of the high-ranked predictive biomarkers. The development of the MarkerPredict tool (which is available on GitHub) for predictive biomarker identification may have a significant impact on clinical decision-making in oncology.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyMachine LearningBiomarkersHumansNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineSignal TransductionBiomarkersBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID41271784
PMCPMC12638940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.