ArticleNPJ science of food2025
Deep learning enabled rapid detection of live bacteria in the presence of food debris.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Foodborne Pathogen Detection from Sensing to Food Safety Systems: A Systematic Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The contamination of food with pathogenic bacteria is a major public health concern, requiring rapid and accurate detection methods. Conventional approaches, such as culture-based or molecular assays, are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and often demand specialized expertise. Here, we developed a deep learning-based strategy for rapid detection and classification of live bacteria using simple white-light microscopic images of microcolonies, even in the presence of morphologically similar food debris. The model, based on ResNet50 with a Region Proposal Network, was trained on Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus subtilis, and debris from chicken, spinach, and cheese. The model trained on bacteria misclassified debris as bacteria (24.2% false positives), whereas the model trained on both bacteria and food debris achieved 0% false positives with 100% precision and 94.4% recall. Validation with GFP-producing B. subtilis in food matrices further confirmed robust performance (mPrecision 94.6%, mRecall 92.5%). This cost-effective method enables reliable bacterial detection in complex foods within 3 h.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.