ArticleNPJ science of learning2025
EEG analysis of brain dynamics in a simulated multi-task and multi-stage learning environment.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive frequency band attention-guided CNN-BiLSTM for Spatial-Spectral-Temporal EEG emotion recognition.Brain informatics · 2026Article
- Emotion recognition based on the temporal patterns of electroencephalogram signals and electrodermal response signals using the TRANSFORMER network.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of brain oscillation patterns during knowledge acquisition has gained attention, yet studies in realistic learning contexts remain limited. This study investigated dynamic brain activity across an 11-lesson biology course simulating a MOOC environment. Twenty undergraduates wore 14-channel Electroencephalography (EEG) headsets while completing lecture, virtual lab, and quiz tasks across three progressive stages. EEG signals from six participants (after quality screening) were analyzed using amplitude, power spectral density (PSD), and phase-locking index (PLI). Wilcoxon rank sum tests revealed significant stage- and task-related differences despite the small sample size, including increased frontal theta during quizzes, parietal alpha suppression during lectures, and high-beta enhancements in later stages of labs and quizzes. Machine learning models trained on EEG features achieved a classification accuracy of 83% for three learning stage discrimination, validating that the brain presents nonidentical functional patterns during cognitive learning. These results underscore the potential for real-time EEG-based personalized educational interventions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.