Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271751›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Determining molecular structure, coordination geometry, and molecular symmetry using a continuous symmetry operation measure software.

Villads R M Nielsen, Thomas Just Sørensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Villads R M NielsenNano-Science Center & Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2100, København Ø, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5808-4433
Thomas Just SørensenNano-Science Center & Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2100, København Ø, Denmark. TJS@chem.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1491-5116

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemists have a strong language describing and defining idealized polyhedra P and symmetry point groups G, but no efficient measure to correlate these to real molecular structures Q. The Continuous Symmetry operation Measure changes this by providing automated symmetry determination and a yardstick for quantifying deviations from symmetry. Symmetry and structure have been ascribed through experience, but this approach is error-prone and provides no measure that can correlate molecular structure to molecular properties. The Continuous Symmetry operation Measure tool solves this issue as it can quantify the symmetry of any structure that can be described as a list of points in space. Here, we compare the Continuous Symmetry Measure, the Continuous Shape Measure, and the Continuous Symmetry operation Measure approaches and demonstrate how the Continuous Symmetry operation Measure can be used as a tool to determine the molecular structure, the coordination geometry, and the symmetry of water, organic molecules, transition metal complexes, and lanthanide compounds. We conclude that the Continuous Symmetry operation Measure is not limited by any of the restrictions present in the other methods and allows a detailed analysis of e.g. phase changes and luminescence.

Identifiers

PMID41271751
PMCPMC12706060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.