ArticleNPJ science of food2025
Early warning predictions of contaminants in animal feed using machine learning.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in food safety.NPJ science of food · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contaminated feed can lead to negative health effects in both animals and humans, as well as result in economic losses. In order to support risk-based monitoring of animal feed, it is essential that the potential presence of food safety hazards can be predicted in an accurate and timely manner. This study used machine learning to predict the presence of four contaminant groups in animal feed: mycotoxins, heavy metals, dioxins and pesticides. Emphasis was placed on a holistic design, using a broad range of external drivers that may affect the presence of the contaminants as model input. Data included historical feed safety monitoring data related to a wide range of different animal feeds, countries, and years (2010-2023) as well as a variety of socioeconomic and weather indicators related to the country of origin. The CatBoost algorithm was the best performing machine learning model and was used to predict the probability that a contaminant in a feed product from a specific country exceeds a predefined threshold (based on European legal limits or guidance values). The average sensitivity was 83% and average specificity was 73% across the four contaminant groups on a year not seen during model training. The results of the model predictions and data descriptions of the monitoring data were incorporated in a decision support system, which has been tested for use in practice. This system offers risk managers better insights in the potential presence of chemical contaminants in animal feed and supports them in the decision-making to safeguard food safety.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.