ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2025
Transferability of polygenic risk scores for metabolic and cardiovascular traits in an underrepresented population.
Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are promising tools for genetic risk stratification, but their performance across ancestries remains uncertain. We evaluated 64 published PRSs for eight cardiometabolic traits in 4879 Thai individuals using imputed SNP-array data. Cross-sectional and six-year longitudinal analyses were performed to assess predictive performances. PRSs for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and lipid traits showed the strongest utility, with the best-performing LDL-C and TC scores explaining up to 9.8% and 7.8% of trait variance, respectively. The T2D PRS achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.70 and consistently stratified disease risk over time. In contrast, PRSs for glycemic traits and cardiovascular disease (CVD) had weaker predictive value; notably, the best-performing CVD PRS showed an inverse association with disease risk. Reduced SNP retention and ancestry-related linkage disequilibrium differences contributed to variability. These findings highlight both the potential and current limitations of PRSs in underrepresented Southeast Asian populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.