Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271709›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Microbial aerotrophy enables continuous primary production in diverse cave ecosystems.

Sean K Bay, Gaofeng Ni, Rachael Lappan, Pok Man Leung, Wei Wen Wong, S I Ry Holland, Nadeesha Athukorala, Kalinka Sand Knudsen, Ziqi Fan, Melina Kerou and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ATP synthesis driven by atmospheric hydrogen concentrations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Sean K BaySecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. S.Bay@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4833-3106
Gaofeng Ni *Department of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-8211
Rachael Lappan *Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3543-8243
Pok Man Leung *Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-827X
Wei Wen Wong *School of Chemistry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
S I Ry HollandSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3326-4163
Nadeesha AthukoralaDepartment of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kalinka Sand KnudsenCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ziqi FanDepartment of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0114-5650
Melina KerouArchaea Biology and Ecogenomics Unit, Department of Functional and Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1657-3041
Surbhi JainDepartment of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Oliver SchmidtDepartment of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6300-7563
Vera EateSchool of Chemistry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David A ClarkeSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-1162
Thanavit JirapanjawatDepartment of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alexander TveitDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Tim FeatonbyDepartment of Environment and Genetics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Susan WhiteDepartment of Environment and Genetics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nicholas WhiteVictorian Speleological Association Inc, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Melodie A McGeochSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3388-2241
Caitlin M SingletonCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9688-8208
Perran L M CookSchool of Chemistry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0444-3488
Steven L ChownSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. steven.chown@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6069-5105
Chris GreeningSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. chris.greening@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7616-0594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aerated caves receive minimal light energy, yet host diverse microbial communities and the strategies allowing them to meet energy and carbon needs remain unclear. We determined the processes and mediators of primary production in aerated limestone and basalt caves through paired metagenomic and biogeochemical profiling. Four caves were sampled, including sediments and biofilms, yielding 94 metagenomes. Based on 1458 metagenome-assembled genomes, over half of microbial cells encode enzymes to use atmospheric trace gases as energy and carbon sources. The most abundant microbes are chemosynthetic primary producers, notably the gammaproteobacterial methanotrophic order Ca. Methylocavales and two uncultivated actinobacterial genera predicted to grow on atmospheric hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide. Biogeochemical and isotopic measurements confirmed that these gases are rapidly consumed at rates likely sustaining a substantial fraction of the community and potentially driving primary production. Conventional chemolithoautotrophs, using ammonium and sulfide, are also enriched and active. Altogether, these results indicate that caves are unique in microbial biodiversity and the biogeochemical processes sustaining them. Consumption of atmospheric trace gases likely has a dual role in caves, providing energy for microbial survival and potentially supporting chemosynthetic growth, thereby introducing organic carbon. This process, defined as 'aerotrophy', operates alongside organic and inorganic inputs.

Indexed as

BacteriaCavesEcosystemBiodiversityBiofilmsCarbon DioxideCarbon MonoxideGammaproteobacteriaGeologic SedimentsHydrogenMetagenomeMetagenomicsMicrobiotaCarbon DioxideCarbon MonoxideHydrogen

Identifiers

PMID41271709
PMCPMC12638822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.