Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271694›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Replay without sharp wave ripples in a spatial memory task.

John Widloski, David J Foster

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John WidloskiAllen Institute for Neural Dynamics, Seattle, WA, USA.
David J FosterHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. davidfoster@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1040-2068

Funding

Synaptic and circuit mechanisms of hippocampal place-cell sequencesR01MH103325 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI FOSTER, DAVID J · 2014 to 2025
$4.4M
Functions of awake hippocampal replayR01NS113557 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI FOSTER, DAVID J · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103325NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113557U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) MH103325.U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) NS113557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sharp-wave ripples and hippocampal replay are widely viewed as inseparable components of episodic memory consolidation, with ripples broadcasting the episodic content carried by replay sequences. Here, we show that in male rats performing an open-field spatial memory task, replay can occur in the absence of ripples. Replays with and without ripples were organized in virtual space: ripples were confined to discrete "ripple fields," spatially restricted regions defined over the virtual locations depicted during replay and independent of the rat's location. Ripple fields were direction-independent, stable within sessions, and adapted to environmental changes induced by barriers. Ripple fields were matched across animals exposed to the same environment, revealing a conserved spatial code. These results indicate that ripples and replay are distinct but coordinated processes, with ripples selectively tagging a subset of replays linked to learning or novelty. We propose that this coupling enables targeted broadcast of salient experiences for consolidation.

Indexed as

HippocampusMemory ConsolidationSpatial MemoryAnimalsMaleMemory, EpisodicRatsRats, Long-Evans

Identifiers

PMID41271694
PMCPMC12639102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.