Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271438›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026

Population-Level Activity Dissociates Preparatory Overt from Covert Attention.

Damian Koevoet, Vicky Voet, Henry M Jones, Edward Awh, Christoph Strauch, Stefan Van der Stigchel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Population-Level Activity Dissociates Preparatory Overt from Covert Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Damian KoevoetExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands d.koevoet@uu.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9395-6524
Vicky VoetExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands.
Henry M JonesDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Mind and Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.ORCID 0000-0001-7719-3646
Edward AwhDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Mind and Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.ORCID 0000-0002-5211-5278
Christoph StrauchExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6380-8635
Stefan Van der StigchelExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural signatures of preparing overt eye movements and directing covert spatial attention overlap as they recruit the same brain areas. Yet, these neural signatures are dissociable at the single cell level: Specific cells within visuo-oculomotor areas are exclusively involved in motor preparation or covert attention. Nevertheless, it has been proposed that many cells in visuo-oculomotor areas are involved in both motor preparation and covert attention, and consequently their neural signatures should functionally overlap to a large degree. Here, we directly tested this proposal: We combined human (both sexes) EEG with sensitive decoding techniques to investigate whether the neural signatures of preparatory overt and covert attention are dissociable across large-scale neuronal populations. We found that neural decoding reliably discerned whether overt or covert attention was shifted well before saccade initiation. Further, inverted encoding modeling revealed earlier and sharper spatially selective activity in preparatory overt than in covert attention. We then asked whether preparatory overt attention achieved sharper spatial selectivity by using "more-of-the-same" covert attention or by recruiting an additional neural process. Cross-decoding results demonstrated that preparatory overt attention recruited at least one additional, frontal process. This additional spatially selective process emerged early and likely reflects motor preparation or predictive remapping. To summarize, we found that the neural signatures of overt and covert attention overlap, yet diverge rapidly, in part because overt attention employs an additional spatially selective neural process. Extending beyond a dissociation on the single-cell level, our findings demonstrate that population-level neural activity dissociates preparatory overt from covert attention.

Indexed as

AttentionEye MovementsAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceSaccadesYoung Adultattentioneye movementsneural decodingpopulationspatial selectivity

Identifiers

PMID41271438
PMCPMC12809630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.