ArticleBMJ open2025
Interventions targeting internalised racism: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInternalised racism (IR) is broadly defined as the acceptance of negative racial stereotypes, beliefs and attitudes about one's own racial or ethnic group. IR is increasingly recognised as a critical component and consequence of racial stress and trauma. Although IR has been linked to a variety of adverse mental and physical health outcomes, the phenomenon remains under-represented in intervention research. This scoping review addresses this gap by systematically mapping the range of interventions and intervention components that explicitly target IR among racially or ethnically minoritised communities and their health-related outcomes. This protocol paper will describe the process of the scoping review. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow methodology from the Joanna Briggs Institute and report using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Using identified controlled vocabulary and keywords, searches will be undertaken using the following databases: MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Embase and Web of Science. This review will include studies describing any intervention or intervention component designed to reduce IR that is conducted with racially or ethnically minoritised populations in any context or setting. No date limit will be applied, and the study must be available in English. Conceptual or opinion pieces without a clear intervention framework will be excluded. Two reviewers will independently screen and select sources and extract data on intervention characteristics, theoretical underpinnings, outcomes and implementation details. Descriptive statistics will summarise study characteristics and outcomes, while a narrative synthesis will explore how interventions conceptualise and address IR. The findings will map existing approaches, highlight research gaps and inform future clinical practice and intervention development. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this review uses published and publicly available data, no ethical approval is required. The findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and briefs to stakeholder networks. REGISTRATION: This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4VDBX).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.