ArticleBMJ open2025
Adherence to Choosing Wisely Africa recommendations in breast cancer care: a cross-sectional study across three Sub-Saharan African centres.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe expenses associated with cancer treatment are increasing at a rapid pace. The financial strain of providing care is experienced worldwide, but is particularly pronounced in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). This has resulted in a growing acknowledgement of the importance of value-based cancer care. Choosing Wisely Africa (CWA) is an initiative aimed at reducing the excessive use and expenses associated with cancer treatment. In this study, we assessed adherence to CWA recommendations for the treatment of breast cancer in three high-volume cancer centres in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).
designA cross-sectional study across Rwanda, Ghana and Tanzania was conducted, involving a review of medical records to assess adherence to five measurable CWA practices in breast cancer care. The study used inferential statistics, such as χ SETTINGS: This study was conducted in three cancer centres (Ocean Road Cancer Institute, Rwanda Military Hospital and Korle Bu Teaching Hospital) in three countries (Tanzania, Rwanda and Ghana, respectively).
participantsA total of 542 patients were recruited. Eligible patients were those with a breast cancer diagnosis and complete data as pertaining to five CWA recommendations.
resultsA total of 542 participants with a mean age of 51 years were included. Participants were well distributed across Ghana (37%), Rwanda (34%) and Tanzania (29%). Female patients represented 97% of the study cohort. Half (51%) of the participants had some form of insurance. The study observed high adherence to cancer staging (94%) before treatment and histological confirmation (91%) before breast lump removal across all sites. Hypofractionation was used in 0% of cases in Rwanda, 42% in Ghana and 70% in Tanzania.
conclusionThis study provides critical insights into the implementation of CWA recommendations in breast cancer care in SSA. It highlights the disparities in adherence to CWA recommendations across different centres, showing the need for policy-driven changes and healthcare infrastructure improvement to standardise cancer care practices in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.