ReviewFood and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association2026
Application of new approach methods (NAMs) in food safety with considerations for new proteins.
Review in Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New approach methodologies in food safety: A survey and commentary on industry adoption, barriers, and the path to regulatory adoption.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As new sources of food emerge and technologies advance, the concepts of safe food and risk assessment have evolved. New Approach Methods (NAMs) are appearing at a pivotal point in toxicology and provide an opportunity to adopt improved science (from a sensitivity and specificity perspective), which is more human relevant, is quicker and is ethically sounder (does not employ animals). The safety standard for any substance added to food in the United States is that there is a reasonable certainty of no harm under the intended conditions of use and applies to food additives and substances that are Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS). This means that the use of NAMs must have a wide acceptability amongst the scientific community, including the regulatory authorities. The demand for new sources of protein ingredients is increasing, and is one category of food to which NAMs can be applied to determine safety. Safety considerations for proteins are described and for this purpose have been grouped into i) biosynthetic proteins produced by precision fermentation, ii) protein concentrates from traditional foods, and iii) total protein extracts. NAMs can be used to support the safety determination of proteins by: i) addressing mechanistic questions; ii) demonstrating equivalence to foods already in the food supply; iii) comparing intake to the amount traditionally consumed; iv) potential allergenicity. Confidence now needs to be built amongst stakeholders in food safety, with more food case studies in which NAMs are used in GRAS determinations and food additive petitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.