Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41270929›Full record

ReviewFood and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association2026

Application of new approach methods (NAMs) in food safety with considerations for new proteins.

Paul R Hanlon, Paul A Hepburn, Joseph A Scimeca, Brian T Schaneberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul R HanlonAbbott Nutrition, 3300 Stelzer Road, Dept. 104070, Bldg RP(3-2), Columbus, OH, 43219, USA. Electronic address: paul.hanlon@abbott.com.
Paul A HepburnSafety and Environmental Assurance Center (SEAC), Unilever, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire, MK44 1LQ, UK. Electronic address: paul.hepburn@unilever.com.
Joseph A ScimecaThe Acheson Group, 13983 Ridge Loop Road, Swan Lake, MT, 59911, USA. Electronic address: Joe.Scimeca@AchesonGroup.com.
Brian T SchanebergInstitute for Food Safety and Health, Department of Food Science, Illinois Tech, 6502 South Archer Road, Bedford Park, IL, 60501, USA. Electronic address: bschaneberg@illinoistech.edu.

Funding

FDA HHS U19 FD005322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As new sources of food emerge and technologies advance, the concepts of safe food and risk assessment have evolved. New Approach Methods (NAMs) are appearing at a pivotal point in toxicology and provide an opportunity to adopt improved science (from a sensitivity and specificity perspective), which is more human relevant, is quicker and is ethically sounder (does not employ animals). The safety standard for any substance added to food in the United States is that there is a reasonable certainty of no harm under the intended conditions of use and applies to food additives and substances that are Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS). This means that the use of NAMs must have a wide acceptability amongst the scientific community, including the regulatory authorities. The demand for new sources of protein ingredients is increasing, and is one category of food to which NAMs can be applied to determine safety. Safety considerations for proteins are described and for this purpose have been grouped into i) biosynthetic proteins produced by precision fermentation, ii) protein concentrates from traditional foods, and iii) total protein extracts. NAMs can be used to support the safety determination of proteins by: i) addressing mechanistic questions; ii) demonstrating equivalence to foods already in the food supply; iii) comparing intake to the amount traditionally consumed; iv) potential allergenicity. Confidence now needs to be built amongst stakeholders in food safety, with more food case studies in which NAMs are used in GRAS determinations and food additive petitions.

Indexed as

Food SafetyProteinsAnimalsHumansRisk AssessmentProteinsFood toxicologyGRASNAMsNovel approach methodologiesProteinsRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41270929
PMCPMC13082855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.