SynthesisPreventive medicine2026
Cancer screening uptake among refugees in high and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Preventive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Co-Designing Culturally Tailored Bowel, Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Interventions With Migrant Communities: Towards Closing the Migration-Related Cancer-Equity Gap in New South Wales, Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCancer screening is a crucial strategy for reducing cancer morbidity and mortality. Refugees encounter disproportionate challenges in preventive healthcare, yet their cancer screening uptake remain poorly characterized. We aimed to synthesize breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening uptake among refugees in high and middle-income countries.
methodA systematic search was conducted using OVID (Medline, Embase), CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to July 2024 to identify studies reporting breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening uptake among refugees. Articles were screened in Covidence, and methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Data were synthesized with a descriptive and narrative approach.
resultOf 2044 articles retrieved, 23 studies included in the review. Refugees exhibited lower cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening uptake than non-refugees with variation across cancer types. Reported rates of ever having Pap test and mammogram among refugee women ranged from 13.9 % to 59 %, and 5.3 % to 63 %, respectively. Commonly cited determinants of cancer screening uptake included education, length of stay, cultural/religious beliefs, and family/provider recommendations.
conclusionRefugees had lower cancer screening uptake than host populations. Targeted, culturally informed multilevel interventions addressing their unique barriers are needed to improve refugees access to cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.