ReviewAnnals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology2026
Emerging IgE and non-IgE targeted therapies for chronic urticaria.
Review in Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRGPRX2 as a novel therapeutic target in headache.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Review
- Systemic Treatments for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Anti-IgE and Beyond.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2026Review
- The MRGPRX2 paradigm shift: Redefining mast cell activation pathways in chronic urticaria.Allergologie select · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic urticaria affects a significant percent of the global population and carries a higher burden of unmet medical need. Current standard-of-care includes antihistamines and omalizumab, but omalizumab is not effective in all patients and has not been found to induce long-term disease remission. This review evaluates the diverse therapeutic pipeline spanning IgE-based and non-IgE-based mast cell targeting strategies, including recent clinical data. The therapeutic landscape has expanded rapidly with multiple mechanisms under investigation. IgE-targeted approaches include omalizumab biosimilars, with CT-P39 having received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Dupilumab received FDA approval for antihistamine-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria supporting the targeting of type 2 cytokines, interleukin-4, and interleukin-13, in this disease. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors have promise, with remibrutinib receiving FDA approval and demonstrating significant reductions in UAS7 in phase 3 trials. c-Kit (c-Kit or KIT) inhibition with barzolvolimab demonstrates robust efficacy with sustained effects post-treatment. Finally, Janus kinase inhibitors, Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 antagonists, and other novel mechanisms are advancing through clinical trials. Although some programs have been discontinued due to safety concerns or lack of efficacy such as fenebrutinib (Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor), THB001 (c-Kit inhibitor), EP262 (Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 antagonist), tezepelumab (anti-TSLP), and lirentelimab and AK006 (sialic acid binding immunoglobulin-like lectin-targeting agents), these studies have informed many of the other positive studies. In summary, in the last year, we have seen the chronic urticaria pipeline mature with multiple phase 3 programs and new approvals representing diverse mechanisms of action. Nevertheless, significant therapeutic gaps persist for omalizumab-refractory disease and chronic-inducible urticaria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.