ArticleUltrasonics2026
Feasibility of deep learning-based cancer detection in ultrasound microvascular images.
Article in Ultrasonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acoustic angiography is a superharmonic contrast-enhanced ultrasound modality that maps 3-D microvasculature with fine spatial resolutions and has demonstrated potential to improve disease detection. However, the application of acoustic angiography for cancer detection currently faces challenges. Quantitative analysis relies on time-consuming, manual segmentation of individual vessels, and inter-operator variability limits reader-based discrimination. This feasibility study aims to address the limitations of current approaches with deep learning for efficient and accurate detection of tumor-associated vasculature in vivo and to validate against quantitative methods that evaluate vascular morphology. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), namely EfficientNet, ResNet, and DenseNet, were trained on a newly collected dataset of acoustic angiography volumes (n = 195 with 98 controls and 97 tumors) in rodents using a nested cross-validation study. The best performing model, 3-D EfficientNet-B0, achieved a mean classification accuracy of 0.928 ± 0.034 with high sensitivity and specificity, comparable to previously published results. Comparison with quantitative methods in tumor cases showed correlation between high network attention regions and morphological features typically associated with malignant vessels, including increased density and tortuosity. These results highlight the efficiency and accuracy of end-to-end CNNs for tumor detection in acoustic angiography volumes, validated by known markers of malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.