Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41270130›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Emergence of sparse coding, balance and decorrelation from a biologically-grounded spiking neural network model of learning in the primary visual cortex.

Marko A Ruslim, Martin J Spencer, Hinze Hogendoorn, Hamish Meffin, Yanbo Lian, Anthony N Burkitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marko A RuslimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0607-396X
Martin J SpencerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2001-9054
Hinze HogendoornSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Hamish MeffinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Yanbo LianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anthony N BurkittDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5672-2772

Funding

Australian Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many experimental and computational studies deal with sparseness, balance, and decorrelation in neural networks and explain the presence of these properties as fulfilling requirements related to optimum energy efficiency, network stability, and information representation. These studies leave the question of how these properties arise in the brain unanswered. The present study attempts to address this question using a model built upon the experimentally observed properties of neural responses, homeostasis, and synaptic plasticity. The experimentally observed properties of sparseness, balance, and decorrelation are then expected to emerge from this substrate. A spiking neural model of the primary visual cortex (V1) was investigated. Populations of both inhibitory and excitatory leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with recurrent connections were provided with spiking input from simulated ON and OFF neurons of the lateral geniculate nucleus. This network was provided with natural image stimuli as input. All synapses underwent learning using spike-timing-dependent plasticity learning rules. A homeostatic rule adjusted the weights and thresholds of each neuron based on target homeostatic spiking rates and mean synaptic input values. These experimentally grounded rules resulted in a number of the expected properties of information representation. The network showed a temporally sparse spike response to inputs and this was associated with a sparse code with Gabor-like receptive fields. The network was balanced at both slow and fast time scales; increased excitatory input was balanced by increased inhibition. This balance was associated with decorrelated firing that was observed as population sparseness. This population sparseness was both the cause and result of the decorrelation of receptive fields. These observed emergent properties (balance, temporal sparseness, population sparseness, and decorrelation) indicate that the network is implementing expected principles of information processing: efficient coding, information maximization ('infomax'), and a lateral or single-layer form of predictive coding. These emergent features of the network were shown to be robust to randomized jitter of the values of key simulation parameters.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsLearningModels, NeurologicalNerve NetPrimary Visual CortexVisual CortexAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronal PlasticityNeurons

Identifiers

PMID41270130
PMCPMC12716757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.