ArticlePloS one2025
Speech-based respiratory diagnostics: A study on COVID-19 detection with machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory sound analysis has emerged as a promising approach for detecting and diagnosing respiratory diseases, including COVID-19. This study investigates using OpenSMILE features for COVID-19 detection using vowel speech sounds /a/, /e/, and /o/ from the COSWARA dataset. OpenSMILE facilitates the extraction of audio and functional features, which are then classified using various machine learning algorithms. Multiple ML classifiers Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, and Artificial Neural Network are evaluated. To enhance classification performance, five distinct feature selection techniques were applied: ANOVA, chi-square, Information Gain, ReliefF, and Gini index. Among these, ANOVA-based selection yielded the most consistent results across classifiers and vowel sounds. Among the models evaluated, the RF classifier achieved the highest accuracies of 76.47% for vowel /a/ and 75.54% for vowels /a/ and /o/, respectively, when combined with ANOVA-selected features (155, 163, and 161 features). To statistically assess model and feature selection performances, the Friedman test was conducted across classifiers and feature selection techniques. Results confirmed the significance of Random Forest and ANOVA as robust combinations. This research contributes to developing accessible, scalable, and non-invasive diagnostic tools, enhancing the potential of telemedicine and remote healthcare systems for the early detection of respiratory diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.