ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
The impact of training front-line health care workers in improving the yield of scabies diagnosis among children under five in a rural community of West Bengal.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionScabies, a parasitic infestation, affects individuals of all age groups. This contagious disease might lead to severe secondary bacterial infections, if left untreated. There is sparse literature available in India, especially in rural areas, focusing on the role of front-line health care workers in determining the prevalence of scabies among children under five. Hence, the primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of training front-line healthcare workers in diagnosing scabies among children under five years in rural areas of West Bengal.
methodsThis community based quasi-experimental (pre-post) study was done in the Saguna Gram Panchayat area. Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA) (n = 25), the primary point of contact with the community at the grass root level of the health care system in India were assessed with a pre-test. A working training module with imaging templates was prepared. ASHA workers were then trained to identify cases of scabies as per International Alliance for Control of Scabies (IACS) guidelines. Complete enumeration was done and a total of 2,119 children under five years residing in the study area were screened for scabies by ASHA workers. The first author of the study examined all the suspected cases of scabies and 10% of the non-suspect cases as reported by each ASHA worker. A post test was conducted on ASHA workers to assess the efficacy of training.
resultsThe mean (±SD) age of ASHA workers was 39.4 (±5.1) years. Most of them were literate up to middle school. There were 2119 children under five years in the study area. Approximately 21 children were suspected of having scabies by ASHA workers. The calculated prevalence of scabies suspect cases was 1%. Most of the family members were unaware of causes, signs, and symptoms of scabies. Data collected by ASHA workers was found to be valid as verified by the first author. There was a significant change in the post-test scores in comparison to pre-test scores of ASHA workers after the training (p-value < 0.05).
conclusionThe prevalence of scabies in the study area was relatively low. High literacy, good hygienic conditions, absence of malnutrition, and age-appropriate immunization might be the favourable factors for the low prevalence reported. With periodic training, ASHA workers can screen children under five during routine house visits, as seen by their improvement in post-test scores. Accurate estimates of burden can aid in developing standard guidelines for the surveillance and management of this neglected tropical disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.