ArticlePloS one2025
Fundamental motor skills, executive functions, and academic achievement of Chinese schoolchildren: Testing a mediating model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearchers have observed the relationship between children's fundamental motor skills (FMS) and their academic achievement. However, the inner workings of this correlation remain underexplored, especially in the context of China. This study addresses this gap by investigating the associations among FMS, such as locomotor, object control, and stability skills, executive function (EF), such as inhibition control and working memory, and academic achievement among Chinese schoolchildren. Furthermore, this research determines how EF mediates the relationship between FMS and academic achievement and whether gender and age moderate the mediating process.
methodThis research involved 733 primary schoolchildren aged 6-12 years from China. First, the Test of Gross Motor Development-Third Edition and the Körperkoordinationstest Für Kinder were used to measure FMS. Then, the Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory was employed to evaluate EF, while standardized written examinations in Chinese and mathematics subjects were used to determine academic achievement.
resultsRegression analyses were conducted. Results revealed that the children's performance in Chinese was negatively correlated with their working memory (β = -0.129, p = 0.005) and inhibition control (β = -0.191, p < 0.001) but positively linked to object control (β = 0.198, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, children's performance in mathematics had a negative relationship with inhibition (β = -0.246, p < 0.001) but positive relationships with object control (β = 0.095, p = 0.009) and stability skills (β = 0.096, p = 0.010). In addition, a mediation analysis was conducted. Results revealed that EF had a partially mediating effect on the relationship between FMS and academic achievement in Chinese (β = 0.110, 95% CI [0.051, 0.175]) and mathematics (β = 0.134, 95% CI [0.070, 0.189]). In the mathematics model, it is only found that age significantly and negatively moderates the path between EF and mathematics (β = -0.627, 95% CI [-0.698, -0.332], p < 0.001).
conclusionsThis study highlights the critical role of FMS and EF in Chinese schoolchildren's academic achievement. The outcomes of this work suggest that educators can bolster FMS and EF through well-crafted, engaging, and encouraging interventions or programs. In turn, these designs can support the academic achievement of schoolchildren. Strategies aimed at improving object control can foster children's performance in Chinese and mathematics. Meanwhile, programs focused on developing stability skills can be implemented to enhance performance in mathematics, especially for younger primary schoolchildren.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.