ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Performance of novel onchocerciasis rapid diagnostic tests in a field setting in South Sudan.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOnchocerciasis is a neglected tropical disease caused by Onchocerca volvulus and is primarily controlled through mass drug administration (MDA) of ivermectin. Current diagnostic tests perform sub-optimally for onchocerciasis elimination programs. According to the WHO, a test needs a sensitivity of ≥60% and a specificity of ≥99.8% for mapping, and a sensitivity of ≥89% and a specificity of ≥99.8% for MDA stopping decisions. We assessed the performance of the commercially available Ov16 SD Bioline rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and three novel RDTs: DDTD biplex type A, type C, and the monoplex type GADx.
methodsThe study included 319 pregnant/post-partum women in Maridi, an onchocerciasis-endemic area in South Sudan. Locally trained healthcare workers conducted RDT with whole blood and skin snip testing. Ov16 SD Bioline RDT was also performed using dried blood spots (DBS). Diagnostic performances were evaluated using three individual reference tests (anti-Ov16 ELISA, O-150 qPCR, skin snip microscopy) and two composite reference standards. DBS were tested for Mansonella spp. using qPCR to account for potential false positives.
resultsAnti-Ov16 ELISA detected O. volvulus antibodies in 49.6% (123/248) participants, while O. volvulus infection was documented by skin snip microscopy in 31.9% (46/144) participants and in 41.8% (50/141) by qPCR. Mansonella spp. infection prevalence was 13.4% (34/253). Monoplex RTDs (Ov16 SD Bioline, GADx) detected O. volvulus antibodies in >60%, while the biplex tests (DDTD A and C) detected 50% seropositivity. Estimated sensitivities of RDTs ranged from 69.4% (Ov16 SD Bioline) to 48.9% (DDTD A), while specificity ranged from 73.2% (DDTD C) to 42.5% (Ov16 SD Bioline).
conclusionO. volvulus and Mansonella spp. prevalence was high among pregnant and post-partum women in Maridi. The novel RDTs demonstrated sensitivities within the range of the commercially available Ov16 SD Bioline RDT, meeting the WHO threshold for onchocerciasis mapping but not for MDA stopping decisions. No RDT met the specificity threshold of 99.8%, although some exhibited slightly higher specificity than Ov16 SD Bioline RDT. This suboptimal specificity raises concerns, underscoring the need for better diagnostic tools to support onchocerciasis elimination efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.