Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41269881›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of multiregion brain cell count data.

Sydney Dimmock, Benjamin M S Exley, Gerald Moore, Lucy Menage, Alessio Delogu, Simon R Schultz, E Clea Warburton, Conor J Houghton, Cian O'Donnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Seizures drive tau propagation in a tauopathy mouse model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sydney DimmockSchool of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Michael Ventris Building, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0163-2048
Benjamin M S ExleySchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Biomedical Sciences Building, University Walk, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Gerald MooreCentre for Neurotechnology and Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
Lucy MenageDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alessio DeloguDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-4714
Simon R SchultzCentre for Neurotechnology and Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6794-5813
E Clea WarburtonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Biomedical Sciences Building, University Walk, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2129-2060
Conor J HoughtonSchool of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Michael Ventris Building, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5017-9473
Cian O'DonnellSchool of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Michael Ventris Building, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2031-9177

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L02134X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R007020/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R513179/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/W024020/1Leverhulme Trust RF-2021-533Medical Research Council MR/S026630/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 206401/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We can now collect cell-count data across whole animal brains quantifying recent neuronal activity, gene expression, or anatomical connectivity. This is a powerful approach since it is a multiregion measurement, but because the imaging is done postmortem, each animal only provides one set of counts. Experiments are expensive, and since cells are counted by imaging and aligning a large number of brain sections, they are time-intensive. The resulting datasets tend to be undersampled with fewer animals than brain regions. As a consequence, these data are a challenge for traditional statistical approaches. We present a 'standard' partially pooled Bayesian model for multiregion cell-count data and apply it to two example datasets. These examples demonstrate that hierarchical Bayesian methods are well suited to these data. In both cases, the Bayesian model outperformed standard parallel

Indexed as

BrainAnimalsBayes TheoremCell CountBayesian analysiscell-count datahierarchical modelingmouseneurosciencerat

Identifiers

PMID41269881
PMCPMC12638045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.