ArticleBlood advances2026
Next-generation FVIIIa-mimetic bispecific antibody NXT007: evaluation in preclinical models of hemostasis and thrombosis.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Divergent molecular strategies of next-generation activated factor VIII mimetics: insights from a direct comparative analysis.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Mechanism of action and impact on thrombin generation of denecimig (Mim8), emicizumab, and zemocimig (NXT007): comparative analysis using sequence-identical analogs.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractNXT007 is a next-generation factor VIIIa (FVIIIa)-mimetic bispecific antibody currently in phase 1/2 trials. It was developed by optimizing the framework of emicizumab to achieve hemostatic normalization in people with hemophilia A (PwHA). Here, we provide a direct comparison of NXT007 with emicizumab, using a wide range of in vitro and in vivo preclinical models of hemostasis and thrombosis. Both NXT007 and emicizumab increased tissue factor (TF)-triggered peak height thrombin generation when spiked into HA-like (FVIII-neutralized) plasma, with NXT007 being more potent than emicizumab, achieving peak at lower concentrations and producing a higher maximum effect. NXT007 and emicizumab delayed fibrinolysis in a dose-dependent manner, with NXT007 having ∼20-fold more potent antifibrinolytic effect. Both bispecific antibodies corrected clotting times and kinetics of HA-like blood, measured by rotational thromboelastometry, with NXT007 being ∼23-fold more potent. In collagen/TF-coated flow chambers perfused with HA-like blood at arterial shear rates, NXT007 and emicizumab increased fibrin deposition without increasing platelet adherence; the maximum effect of NXT007 was greater than that of emicizumab and was achieved at lower concentration. Following tail vein transection in HA mice, NXT007 was more potent than emicizumab in controlling bleeding. In a ferric chloride carotid injury model, the administration of NXT007 and emicizumab at plasma concentrations of ∼20 to 200 μg/mL had no effect on maximum blood flow reduction, indicating that they do not present a prothrombotic profile in this model. Overall, our data support the ongoing clinical evaluation of NXT007 and suggest that it can substantially improve therapeutic efficacy for PwHA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.