ArticleBlood advances2026
Risk stratification of low-dose cytarabine and venetoclax in patients with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1/2 Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Low-Dose Cytarabine in Treatment-Naïve Subjects With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Are ≥ 60 Years of Age and Who Are Not Eligible for Standard Anthracycline-Based Induction Therapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Phase 3 Study of Venetoclax Co-Administered With Low Dose Cytarabine Versus Low Dose Cytarabine in Treatment Naïve Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- HMA+VEN triplet regimens for the initial treatment of AML in adults (PRO).Blood advances · 2026Article
- Anthracycline and antimetabolite, trigger distinct resistance mechanisms in TP53Cell death discovery · 2026Article
- Venetoclax for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: Prospects, resistance mechanisms and management strategies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractPrognostic risk categorization aids treatment selection for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) classifications (2017 and 2022) for AML have been used to stratify outcomes for patients receiving intensive chemotherapy, their application to patients receiving less intensive therapy, such as azacitidine plus venetoclax, has been less satisfactory. In response, a 4-gene classifier that stratifies older patients with AML unfit for intensive chemotherapy into those with higher benefit (wild type), intermediate benefit (FLT3-internal tandem duplication [ITD] or NRAS/KRAS mutation), or lower benefit (TP53 mutation) after azacitidine plus venetoclax treatment was developed. We hypothesized that this 4-gene classifier may also have prognostic utility in patients receiving low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) plus venetoclax. Surprisingly, neither the ELN 2022 criteria nor the 4-gene azacitidine-venetoclax classifier model adequately stratified prognosis in a cohort of 139 patients receiving LDAC plus venetoclax. Patients with concurrent NPM1 and FLT3-ITD/RAS variants performed surprisingly well with LDAC plus venetoclax (complete remission [CR]/CR with incomplete blood count recovery [CRi] rate, 92%; median overall survival [OS], 29.67 months). Data-driven (sequential bootstrapping and tree-based) and empirical analyses identified complex karyotype and/or presence of TP53 mutation as prognostically relevant molecular/cytogenetic risk markers. Patients with complex karyotype and/or TP53 mutation displayed poor clinical outcomes (CR/CRi, 25%; median OS, 3.48 months). Notably, 74% of the study population lacked these poor prognostic markers and had a 67% CR/CRi rate with a median OS of 14.92 months. Overall, these data support the importance of molecular subclassification in defining treatment outcomes to venetoclax-based therapies. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02287233 and #NCT03069352.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.