ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2025
Unrevealing the sequence of dysphagia progression in ALS: an event-based, FEES-driven staging approach.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dysphagia drives morbidity and mortality in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), yet staging systems treat it as a binary milestone and do not capture its trajectory. Reports diverge on the earliest abnormality, with some citing cohesive-bolus inefficiency and others thin-liquid impairment. Furthermore, how these findings relate to patient-perceived dysphagia remains unclear. In a prospective cohort, 78 incident ALS patients underwent one or more fiberoptic endoscopic evaluations of swallowing (FEES), yielding 108 assessments. Pharyngeal residue for four consistencies was rated with a validated scale. An event-based model (EBM) inferred the temporal order of abnormalities and defined a five-stage, FEES-based dysphagia staging system (DSS). Construct, convergent, discriminant, and prognostic validity were tested against established measures; responsiveness was assessed in patients with longitudinal FEES. The EBM identified a consistent sequence of swallowing impairment: solids, semisolids, liquids, saliva. Patient-perceived dysphagia occurred in 38% of DSS 1-2 evaluations versus 100% of DSS 3-4. The DSS showed construct validity by distinguishing bulbar- from spinal-onset ALS and convergent validity with the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore and LMN bulbar score. Discriminant validity was supported by weak, non-significant associations with spinal/respiratory measures. Agreement with King's staging was moderate, and all King's stage IV patients mapped to DSS stages 3-4. The DSS was responsive to change (Stuart-Maxwell χ² = 11.034; p = 0.026). The EBM reconciles prior discrepancies: pathophysiology begins with solids, whereas symptom recognition typically coincides with liquid-phase residue. The FEES-based DSS is reproducible and clinically meaningful for tracking bulbar involvement and identifying higher-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41269662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.