ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
CT-based evaluation of thoracic anatomy in AS vs AR patients undergoing MIAVR.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, the difference in anatomical variables was considered between Aortic stenosis (AS) and Aortic regurgitation (AR) groups by preoperative computed tomography (CT) in minimally invasive cardiac surgery for aortic valve replacement (MIAVR).
methodsPatients who underwent AVR between 2012 and 2021 at our center were retrospectively analyzed in two groups, AS and AR. The final 278 samples possessed detailed clinical information of the patients. The six items were measured in preoperative CT and compared in significant difference in number.
resultsNo significant differences were found in the patients' characteristics between the AS and AR groups except for age, sex and body surface area. The number of younger and male patients was higher in the AR group than in the AS group (P < 0.01), including a larger body surface area (P < 0.01). The AR group had larger rightward laterality aorta and third ICS (AS vs AR - 3.9 ± 8.9 vs 0.6 ± 8.9 mm, P < 0.01; 14.2 ± 1.3 vs 15 ± 1.6 cm, P < 0.01, respectively).
conclusionsPreoperative CT revealed thoracic anatomical differences between AS and AR patients undergoing MIAVR. Although no direct correlation with cross-clamp time was observed except for AP distance in both AR and AS, surgeons should be aware that these anatomical features-particularly the rightward aorta and deeper and more caudally positioned AV in AR patients to make surgical decision making, surgical planning. CT-based evaluation is a valuable tool for guiding approach strategy and patient selection in MIAVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.