Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41269530›Full record

ArticleBotanical studies2025

The Biella paradox: the resilience of plant foraging in a post-industrial pre-alpine area of Northern Italy.

Mousaab Alrhmoun, Naji Sulaiman, Sofia Villa, Michele Filippo Fontefrancesco, Andrea Pieroni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Botanical studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mousaab AlrhmounUniversity of Gastronomic Sciences, Piazza Vittorio Emanuele II 9, 12042, Pollenzo , Italy. m.alrhmoun@unisg.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0675-8560
Naji SulaimanUniversity of Gastronomic Sciences, Piazza Vittorio Emanuele II 9, 12042, Pollenzo , Italy. n.sulaiman@unisg.it.
Sofia VillaUniversity of Gastronomic Sciences, Piazza Vittorio Emanuele II 9, 12042, Pollenzo , Italy.
Michele Filippo FontefrancescoDepartment of Sociology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Fra Agostino Gemelli, 1, 20123, Milan, Italy.
Andrea PieroniUniversity of Gastronomic Sciences, Piazza Vittorio Emanuele II 9, 12042, Pollenzo , Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study explores the continuity and transformation of wild plant foraging practices in Biella, Piedmont (northwestern Italy), over the past 55 years. The aim was to assess how cultural, economic, and environmental shifts have shaped local ethnobotanical knowledge and practices, using a 1970 survey as a baseline for comparison. Ethnobotanical fieldwork was conducted with 15 local informants to document current wild plant uses for food and herbal teas.

resultsThe resulting dataset of 82 species was compared with a historical record of 93 species to identify patterns of continuity, loss, and innovation. Three main patterns emerged: (1) the disappearance of certain traditionally foraged plants, not due to ecological absence but largely because of socio-economic changes like the decline of pastoralism and the loss of daily interaction with mountain environments (2) the emergence of new foraging practices involving species that grow near settlements, linked to evolving lifestyles and land use; and (3) a relatively robust preservation of traditional ecological knowledge when compared to other Alpine areas. This resilience is attributed to the area's geographic marginality, the socio-economic aftermath of the textile industry's collapse, and the strength of local traditions such as home gardening and communal land use.

conclusionWild plant foraging remains a living tradition in Biella, marked by both persistence and adaptation. The findings underscore the dynamic nature of ethnobotanical knowledge and its potential role in sustainability, food security, and cultural heritage preservation amid rural and peri-urban change.

Indexed as

Cultural heritageEthnobotanyForaging practicesSocio-economic changeTraditional ecological knowledge (TEK)

Identifiers

PMID41269530
PMCPMC12638624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.