ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Optimizing Care in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Current Treatments and the Second-Line Decision.
Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New and emerging treatments for PBC-related pruritus.Drugs in context · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, autoimmune, cholestatic liver disease characterized by small bile duct injury that can lead to advanced liver disease including cirrhosis and liver failure. Early diagnosis of PBC is crucial to mitigate the onset of advanced liver disease. However, even after diagnosis, some patients with PBC remain untreated or continue to progress to advanced disease despite initiation of treatment. Further, extrahepatic symptoms such as pruritus and fatigue substantially affect quality of life yet may not be addressed with standard treatment. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) stands as the first-line treatment for PBC and has been shown to increase survival and reduce the need for liver transplantation. Nonetheless, some patients have an inadequate response or are intolerant to UDCA. Furthermore, UDCA does not address pruritus or fatigue. Approved second-line therapies for PBC include elafibranor and seladelpar. Elafibranor and seladelpar were recently granted Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in the accelerated pathway after reducing alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels and showing promise in improving patient-reported symptoms such as pruritus and fatigue, though they are not without adverse events. With the availability of these new, second-line therapies, current treatment guidelines should be updated to emphasize early evaluation of treatment response to UDCA and to incorporate patient-reported outcomes that impact symptom burden and quality of life. With the current emphasis on patient engagement and personalized medicine, clinicians should consider evaluating symptom burden at diagnosis and improving quality of life to be as important as ALP levels in terms of successful PBC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.