ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2026
UK Resuscitation Advanced Life Support Guidelines: Should the Paradigm be Extended?
Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac arrest continues to be a predominant cause of mortality worldwide, necessitating its rapid identification, and intervention by reversible aetiologies to optimise successful outcomes. The established 4H 4T framework has served as a foundational guide for advanced life support (ALS) protocols since its formal introduction in the 2000 International Guidelines on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC), effectively targeting critical conditions such as hypoxia, hypothermia, hypo-/hyperkalaemia, hypovolaemia, tension pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade, thrombosis, and exposure to toxins. However, this framework inadequately addresses other significant factors: specifically hypoglycaemia and tachy- and bradyarrhythmias. Hypoglycaemia, a reversible and treatable metabolic state, poses substantial threats to cardiovascular stability, particularly in people with diabetes and in association with sepsis. It disrupts myocardial repolarisation, prolongs the QT interval, and may instigate the R-on-T phenomenon, which can precipitate life-threatening arrhythmias. Likewise, tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias often precipitate cardiac arrest, thereby warrant dedicated attention within ALS protocols. This paper advocates expanding the current 4H 4T framework to include hypoglycaemia and tachy- and bradyarrhythmias as critical and reversible causes of cardiac arrest (5H 5T). The rationale for such a paradigm shift is supported by evidence from clinical studies, case reports, and experimental models that demonstrate the adverse effect of these conditions on cardiovascular integrity and alert clinicians to look for these reversible factors. The inclusion of these factors into ALS protocols will necessitate revising resuscitation guidelines, modifying training for healthcare practitioners, and including systematic monitoring of blood glucose alongside routine assessment of cardiac rhythm during resuscitation procedures. Future research should focus on elucidating the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these conditions, to establish operational thresholds for intervention, and validate their integration into resuscitation frameworks. By expanding the conceptualisation of reversible causes, the proposed 5H/5T framework would offer a more rational and practical approach to the management of cardiac arrest, to improve the survival and recovery of these critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.