Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41269471›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine - open2025

Detraining Effects Following Chronic Stretching Training on Range of Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Andreas Konrad, Konstantin Warneke, Olyvia Donti, Ioli Panidi, Vasiliki Gaspari, Masatoshi Nakamura, Ewan Thomas, Gregory C Bogdanis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andreas KonradInstitute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, Mozartgasse 14, Graz, 8010, Austria. andreas.konrad@uni-graz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5588-1824
Konstantin WarnekeInstitute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, Mozartgasse 14, Graz, 8010, Austria.
Olyvia DontiSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 17237, Greece.
Ioli PanidiSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 17237, Greece.
Vasiliki GaspariSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 17237, Greece.
Masatoshi NakamuraFaculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, NishiKyushu University, 4490-9 Ozaki, Kanzaki, 842-8585, Saga, Japan.
Ewan ThomasSport and Exercise Sciences Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Via Giovanni Pascoli 6, Palermo, 90144, Italy.
Gregory C BogdanisSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 17237, Greece.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund P 32078-B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStretch training can chronically increase the range of motion (ROM) of a joint. However, to date, there is still a need for a comprehensive synthesis of knowledge regarding the effects of training cessation (i.e., detraining) on ROM gains from stretching.

objectivesThe purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to investigate the detraining effects of stretch training on ROM.

methodsPubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Controlled trials and randomized controlled trials with a training and a detraining phase that involved any type of stretching training, with healthy participants of all ages, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools. A meta-analysis was performed to assess effect sizes for ROM changes between pre-intervention to post-intervention, pre-intervention to detraining, and post-intervention to detraining. Additionally, the effects of potential moderators were assessed (i.e., stretching technique, duration per session, frequency per week, duration of detraining, of the training period, and type of activity performed during detraining). GRADE analysis was used to determine the quality of evidence.

resultsOut of the 189 records retrieved, 13 studies with a total of 556 participants were included in this review. These studies involved stretch training programs lasting from five to 15 weeks, followed by a detraining phase ranging from two to six weeks. Risk of bias was low in 74.3-77.1% of all criteria. Confidence in cumulative evidence was high for ROM gains and low for ROM maintenance following detraining. In the studies examined stretching training induced large increases in ROM (ES = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.54-1.31, p < 0.001). A moderate higher ROM was found after a detraining period compared to pre-intervention (ES = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33-0.77, p < 0.001), while small ROM decreases were observed from post-intervention until the end of the detraining period (ES=-0.41; 95% CI: -0.73 - -0.09, p = 0.016). Moderator analysis showed that the frequency of stretching per week significantly moderated the ROM enhancements when comparing post-intervention to detraining only, and that only active participants maintained ROM from post-intervention to detraining, while other moderators showed no significant effects.

conclusionsChronic gains in ROM are maintained above baseline levels after stretching training cessation. However, training cessation for 2-6 weeks slightly decreases ROM compared to post-intervention levels, indicating that to maintain ROM gains over time, some form of flexibility-enhancing method should be used.

Indexed as

Long-term stretchingStretch trainingTraining cessation

Identifiers

PMID41269471
PMCPMC12638565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.