Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41269470›Full record

ArticleBrain informatics2025

Biotuner: A python toolbox integrating music theory and signal processing for harmonic analysis of physiological and natural time series.

Antoine Bellemare-Pepin, Karim Jerbi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antoine Bellemare-PepinCoCo Lab, Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. antoine.bellemare9@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7340-1700
Karim JerbiCoCo Lab, Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3790-9651

Funding

Fonds de recherche du Québec - Nature et technologies 2023-RS6-309472Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture 274043Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2021-03426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Biotuner Toolbox is an open-source Python toolbox for biosignals that integrates concepts from neuroscience, music theory, and signal processing. It introduces a harmonic perspective on physiological oscillations by applying musical constructs such as consonance, rhythm, and scale construction.

methodsThe core biotuner_object processes neural, cardiac, and auditory time series, providing a unified interface for extracting spectral peaks, computing harmonicity metrics, and supporting downstream analyses. Companion modules extend harmonic analyses across temporal (time-resolved harmonicity), spatial (harmonic connectivity), and spectral (harmonic spectrum) dimensions.

resultsBiotuner identifies harmonic structure across different biosignals, revealing significant variations in harmonicity between physiological states. Specifically, the toolbox extracts spectral peaks from complex signals using multiple algorithms, ensuring robust peak detection under varying signal-to-noise ratios. Moreover, we show how harmonicity metrics change across distinct sleep stages and capture variations in the slopes of the aperiodic (1/f) component of the power spectrum.

conclusionBiotuner provides an extensible framework that unifies music-theoretic constructs with biosignal processing, enabling hypothesis-driven analyses for researchers and, in parallel, creative exploration of complex natural patterns for artists.

Indexed as

Biosignal analysisEEGHarmonicityMusic theoryNeuroscienceSignal processing

Identifiers

PMID41269470
PMCPMC12647408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.