ReviewJapanese journal of ophthalmology2026
Clinical characteristics and management of dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease in Japan.
Review in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypersensitivity Reactions to Biologics: Advances in Diagnosis and Management.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- Article
- The evaluation of cytokine profiles in atopic dermatitis patients treated with dupilumab: association with ocular complications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease (DAOSD) is one of the most common adverse events associated with dupilumab (an anti-interleukin-4-receptor-alpha monoclonal antibody) during the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). However, it rarely occurs in patients with bronchial asthma or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Adequate understanding of DAOSD is important for proper diagnosis and appropriate ophthalmic intervention. The aim of this review was to summarize and discuss the clinical characteristics and management of DAOSD in Japan. The pathogenesis of DAOSD can be explained by the dry eye disease, upregulated T helper 17 and 22 cells, and Demodex theories. The main symptoms of DAOSD are irritation/pain, redness, pruritus, discharge, and light sensitivity. Patients with AD and DAOSD as an adverse event develop various types of ocular surface disease, including blepharitis, blepharoconjunctivitis, conjunctivitis, keratoconjunctivitis, and keratitis. In ophthalmologic practice, to diagnose and treat DAOSD, physicians must understand the condition of the patient, make a differential diagnosis of conjunctivitis, determine concurrent dry eye, and assess DAOSD severity. Red flags for ophthalmologic intervention have been reported by organizations and institutions in various countries, which have highlighted the need for appropriate ophthalmologic intervention. Treatment of DAOSD involves topical treatments with artificial tears, antiallergic drugs, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressive drugs. In conclusion, patients with severe DAOSD require ophthalmologic intervention, and clinical collaboration between ophthalmologists and dermatologists is crucial for patients with AD during dupilumab treatment. This review can assist ophthalmologists in their daily practice and in their management of patients with DAOSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.