In one paragraphArticle in Molecular neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
10 authors.
Sebastián Rivas *Laboratory of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires/National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (UBA-CONICET), C1428, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5062-5362 Laura Esquivel *Laboratory of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires/National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (UBA-CONICET), C1428, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Julia BussoLaboratory of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires/National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (UBA-CONICET), C1428, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Angeles SallesLaboratory of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires/National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (UBA-CONICET), C1428, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María KrawczykLaboratory of Neuropharmacology of Memory Processes, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires/National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (UBA-CONICET), C1113 AAD, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Melina Sol AlvarezLaboratory of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires/National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (UBA-CONICET), C1428, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María Florencia AcutainLaboratorio de Sinapsis y Neurobiología Celular, Instituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia "Prof E de Robertis" (IBCN), CONICET-UBA, C1121 ABG, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8625-9391 María Verónica BaezLaboratorio de Sinapsis y Neurobiología Celular, Instituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia "Prof E de Robertis" (IBCN), CONICET-UBA, C1121 ABG, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5105-2888 Mariano Martín Boccia *Laboratory of Neuropharmacology of Memory Processes, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires/National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (UBA-CONICET), C1113 AAD, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina. mboccia@ffyb.uba.ar.
Ramiro Freudenthal *Laboratory of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires/National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (UBA-CONICET), C1428, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina. ramirofreudenthal@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-1716 Funding
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas PIP 2021-2023 11220200102878COUniversidad de Buenos Aires UBACyT 2023, 2002 0220 2001 38BA
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Histone deacetylase inhibitors are known to influence memory consolidation, with synaptic protein acetylation playing a crucial role in plasticity processes such as long-term potentiation (LTP). In this study, we explored the role of non-histone protein acetylation in the consolidation of long-term inhibitory avoidance (IA) memory. We found that the histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) inhibitor, Tubastatin A, significantly enhanced memory consolidation when administered either intraperitoneally or directly into the hippocampus immediately after memory acquisition, but not when administered three hours later. Tubastatin A also preserved tubulin acetylation in hippocampal extracts in vitro and induced an increase in acetylation levels in vivo. Training in the IA task led to alterations in tubulin acetylation within synaptic extracts, specifically at residues other than lysine 40 of α-tubulin, accompanied by changes in synaptic composition. Furthermore, chemical LTP in primary hippocampal neuron cultures increased dendritic and synaptic acetylation, as well as the density of PSD95 clusters. These findings establish a role for HDAC6 in modulating tubulin acetylation during memory consolidation and provide new insights into the broader significance of non-histone protein acetylation in memory formation.
Indexed as
Histone Deacetylase 6Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsMemory, Long-TermSynapsesAcetylationAnimalsAvoidance LearningDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinHippocampusHydroxamic AcidsIndolesLong-Term PotentiationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinHdac6 protein, mouseHistone Deacetylase 6Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsIndolestubastatin ATubulinAcetylationConsolidationHippocampusLong-term memorySynapse
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390