ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Technical note: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of diatom testing in methomyl poisoning case.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diatom testing is conducted in forensic medicine primarily to support the diagnosis of drowning. In our previous study, a large number of diatoms, potentially originating from methomyl, were detected in the lungs of a cat found dead under circumstances suggestive of methomyl poisoning, but not involving drowning or submersion. In the present study, we collected human and animal cases suspected of methomyl poisoning, where the bodies showed no evidence of drowning or submersion. Diatom tests were performed both quantitatively and qualitatively on the gastric contents, lungs, liver, kidney, and fur samples. Quantitative analysis using light microscopy revealed a large number of Stephanodiscus spp., the same genus of diatoms found in methomyl-containing insecticides, in the gastric contents and in some of the lung samples. Although qualitative analysis with electron microscopy did not enable species-level identification, the observed Stephanodiscus spp. were presumed to be fossil species derived from diatomaceous earth. Since diatomaceous earth is sometimes added as a carrier or diluent to concentrate the active ingredient in insecticides, it is possible that diatoms may be present in the bodies of individuals that died from methomyl poisoning. Therefore, relying solely on the quantity of diatoms may result in false-positive diagnoses of drowning. To avoid such misinterpretation, it is essential to perform qualitative analyses to assess the species composition of the diatoms in addition to quantitative assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41269323What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.