SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2026
Robotic-assisted surgery in children under 10 kg: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Beyond da Vinci: a systematic review of next-generation multiport robotic platforms in pediatric surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Evolution of robotic-assisted resection of pediatric neuroblastic tumors: a retrospective analysis.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic-assisted resection of pediatric intracavitary lesions: expanding the boundaries of minimally invasive surgery.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Comparison of Robot-Versus Laparoscopy-Assisted Resection of Choledochal Cysts in Infants Aged Less than 3 Months.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted radical resection for choledochal cysts in infants under three months of age: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted surgery for Hirschsprung disease in children: initial single-center experience.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic-assisted surgery for choledochal cyst in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRobotic surgery has been progressively adopted in pediatric patients over recent years, accompanied by a reduction in the age and weight of those treated, as well as an expansion of surgical indications in increasingly smaller children.
methodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and EMBASE for studies on robotic-assisted surgery in children weighing under 10 kg, registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251110421). Two reviewers independently screened all records against predefined inclusion criteria. Extracted data included study design, patient demographics, surgical indications, intraoperative variables, and perioperative outcomes.
resultsA total of 37 articles, comprising 1,437 pediatric patients under 10 kg and published between 2007 and 2025, met the inclusion criteria for narrative synthesis in our systematic review. Of these, 18 (48.6%) were retrospective descriptive analyses, 14 (37.8%) were retrospective comparative studies, and 5 (13.5%) were case reports. Robotic surgery indications were grouped into five categories: congenital diaphragmatic anomalies, addressed in two studies (5.4%); gastrointestinal disorders, reported in eight studies (21.6%); hepatobiliary procedures-including biliary atresia and choledochal cyst excision-featured in eleven studies (29.7%); colorectal procedures, such as anorectal malformations and Hirschsprung's disease, reported in seven studies (18.9%); and urological procedures, described in nine studies (24.3%). A total of 89 postoperative complications (9.6%) and 10 conversions (1.1%) were reported.
conclusionsRobotic surgery in patients weighing less than 10 kg has multiple indications, including thoracic, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, colorectal, and urological procedures. It seems to be a safe and effective approach in this population, with low conversion and postoperative complication rates. The lack of comparative and prospective studies, along with the heterogeneity of procedures, are the main limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41269313What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.