ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Training intensity distribution for sprinter swimmers: suggestions for swimming coaches and scientists.
Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inclusion of the 50 m butterfly, backstroke, and breaststroke events in the 2028 Olympic Games is likely to influence training methodologies and performance trajectories, considering that in competitive swimming, coaches already implement different training approaches for sprinter swimmers. This study examines whether elite sprint specialists, particularly those specializing in 50 m events, should prioritize high-intensity interval training (HIIT) over the traditionally dominant overdistance training models. The discussion aims to inform coaches and researchers about evolving approaches to sprint training and guide future research on intensity distribution in sprint swimming. There is a clear distinction in energy system demands between sprint events: the 50 m event has an aerobic contribution of approximately 20%, while in the 100 m event, the aerobic contribution can rise to around 40-50%. Despite the high anaerobic demands of the 50 m, many coaches continue to implement a Polarized Training Intensity Distribution (TID), characterized by a significant proportion of aerobic training. Based on recent developments in sprint swimming and some aspects of current literature support for the potential benefits of a greater emphasis on HIIT, assisted sprints, and overspeed training, along with earlier and more targeted specialization for sprinters, and an increased emphasis on dryland strength and conditioning. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to examine the efficacy of different TID approaches, particularly for elite athletes specializing exclusively in the 50 m distance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41269307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.