ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Fine-mapping methods for complex traits: essential adaptations for samples of related individuals.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translating functional molecular knowledge into crop-breeding success.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Multi-ancestry modeling improves fine-mapping resolution, protein prediction, and discovery for proteome-wide association studies.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Bayesian fine-mapping pinpoints candidate genes and pleiotropic loci of production traits from a chicken backcrossing scheme.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Multi-trait GWAS of reaction norm parameters reveals environment-responsive loci influencing reproductive performance in heifers.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Causal variants in animal genomes: approaches to identification, phenotypic impact, and implications for selective breeding.BMC genomics · 2026Review
- COLGALT2 Polymorphisms are Associated with Osteoarthritis Risk and Clinical Severity in a Chinese Population.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fine-mapping causal variants from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) loci is challenging in populations with substantial relatedness, such as livestock, as standard methods often assume unrelatedness, leading to poor fine-mapping accuracy. Here, we introduce a comprehensive Bayesian framework to address this. Our approach features BFMAP-Shotgun Stochastic Search for individual-level data, which uses a linear mixed model (LMM) and shotgun stochastic search with simulated annealing. For summary statistics, we develop FINEMAP-adj and SuSiE-adj, novel strategies that directly use standard FINEMAP and SuSiE for samples of related individuals by employing LMM-derived inputs (particularly a relatedness-adjusted linkage disequilibrium matrix). Furthermore, genomic-feature posterior inclusion probability (PIP), implemented here as gene-level PIP (PIPgene), is proposed to enhance detection power by aggregating variant signals. Extensive simulations based on pig genotypes across diverse heritability levels and population structures (pure-breed and multi-breed) show our methods substantially outperform existing tools (FINEMAP, SuSiE, FINEMAP-inf, SuSiE-inf, and GCTA-COJO) in samples of related individuals, achieving notable improvements in fine-mapping accuracy (e.g. up to several-fold increases in the area under the precision-recall curve). Multi-breed populations greatly enhance fine-mapping accuracy compared to single-breed populations. Additionally, PIPgene markedly improves candidate gene identification. Application to Duroc pig traits demonstrates practical utility, with functional enrichment analysis confirming our methods' superior identification of biologically relevant variants. This work provides robust, validated methods and associated software for accurate fine-mapping in populations with complex relatedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.