ArticleUrolithiasis2025
Intrarenal pelvic pressure and renal temperature during 6.3Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope surgery: an in vitro experiment.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parameter mapping for the use of flexible and navigable suction sheath: an in vitro study.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the dynamic changes of intrarenal pelvic pressure (IPP) and renal temperature during intracorporeal lithotripsy using a 6.3 Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope.An in vitro porcine kidney model was established with percutaneous puncture creating a 18 Fr peel-away sheath access to the upper, middle, and lower calyceal fornix.Standardized calcium oxalate stones were placed in the renal pelvis.A fiber optic temperature probe and pressure sensor were inserted via the sheath for synchronous monitoring of temperature and IPP.The entire system was maintained in a thermostatic water bath.A super-pulsed thulium fiber laser (wavelength 1940 nm, pulse energy 0.1 J, frequency 300 Hz, power 30 W) combined with a precision laboratory pump was used for lithotripsy through the 6.3 Fr ureteroscope.Normal saline (25 ± 1℃) was infused at irrigation rates ranging from 10 to 150 mL/min (increments of 10 mL/min).A senior urologist performed laser lithotripsy at the upper, middle, and lower calyceal fornices with the ureteroscope tip precisely positioned.The 150 μm laser fiber maintained a 1 mm working distance from the stone surface.Each 60-second lithotripsy session was repeated 5 times per parameter set.In the in vitro model, no significant differences in IPP dynamics were observed across upper, middle, or lower calyceal positions at varying irrigation rates (10–150 mL/min, P > 0.05). IPP increased linearly with irrigation rate: mean IPP reached 28.65 ± 0.93mmHg at 90 mL/min and exceeded the safety threshold at 31.23 ± 1.12 mmHg when irrigation rate increased to 100 mL/min.Conversely, renal temperature decreased with increasing irrigation rate: maximum temperature reached 45.1 °C at 20 mL/min and dropped to 40.9 °C (below safety threshold) at 30 mL/min.This study demonstrates that during RIRS using a 6.3 Fr disposable ureteroscope (non-UAS setting), maintaining irrigation rates between 30 and 90 mL/min ensures both IPP and renal temperature remain within safe thresholds, supporting safe and effective lithotripsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41269274What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.