Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41269255›Full record

ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Breast Augmentation with Inferior Muscular Support: The Indication, Technique Evolution, and Outcomes.

Jiangmiao Xie, Runqing Su, Qiuyun Liu, Wenchao Zhang, Zenan Xia, Xiao Long, Ang Zeng

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiangmiao XieDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China.
Runqing SuBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Beacon House, Queens Road, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK.
Qiuyun LiuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China.
Wenchao ZhangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China.
Zenan XiaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China. tienan523523@163.com.
Xiao LongDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China. pumclongxiao@126.com.
Ang ZengDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China. pumchza@qq.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4680-7099

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-B-040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smooth implants, favored for their lower risk of rupture and BIA-ALCL, encounter stability challenges in preventing implant displacement and bottoming out. Therefore, a stronger support of the lower pole is necessary to immobilize the implant. Various techniques, which involve manipulating the pectoralis major (PM) muscle, serratus anterior muscle (SAM), external abdominal oblique muscle (EOAM), and their fascia to create a muscle-fascia pocket, have emerged as strategies to ensure implant coverage and improve stability. In this review, we redefine and categorize these surgical approaches into two types: mono-muscular flap (MMF) and bi-muscular flap (BMF). These advancements reflect evolving trends and principles in breast augmentation, emphasizing the importance of both implant coverage and stability. Clinical evidence suggests that techniques with lower-pole support are particularly beneficial for patients at high risk of implant displacement or ptosis, as well as those undergoing revision surgeries. Further refinement of techniques that compromise the conflict between muscle support and release should be of greater concern.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsMammaplastySurgical FlapsEstheticsFemaleHumansPectoralis MusclesReoperationRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeBreast augmentationBreast augmentation mastopexyBreast implant supportComplications of breast implantationImplant malpositionTechnique evolution

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.