Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268941›Full record

ArticleZoo biology

The Welfare and Educational Impacts of Encounter Experiences and Displays on Zoo-Housed Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens).

Sarah L Spooner, Rebecca N Lewis, Ewan Davies, Katherine Whitehouse-Tedd, Leah J Williams, Kanako Tomisawa, Mark J Farnworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoo biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah L SpoonerSchool of Animal Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Southwell, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6650-3135
Rebecca N LewisConservation Science, Chester Zoo, Upton, Chester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-6779
Ewan DaviesConservation Science, Chester Zoo, Upton, Chester, UK.
Katherine Whitehouse-TeddSchool of Animal Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Southwell, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0061-489X
Leah J WilliamsConservation Science, Chester Zoo, Upton, Chester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8004-2187
Kanako TomisawaOmuta City Zoo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2455-381X
Mark J FarnworthSchool of Animal Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Southwell, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6226-0818

Funding

This study received no external funding, however, was based on prior research conducted at Nottingham Trent University where S.L.S., K.W.T. and M.F. were employed.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Close animal encounters potentially increase visitor connection to species and present an educational and fundraising opportunity. However, evidence of the impacts on animal welfare or visitor education is limited. Red panda (Ailurus Fulgens spp.) encounters are gaining popularity despite a lack of research on their effects. As red panda are a characteristically cautious species and prone to disturbance, concern has been raised as to their suitability for encounters. We examined the extent and composition of red panda encounters amongst 150 Global Species Management Plan (GSMP) member zoos (survey responses), and their impact on longevity and reproduction (species 360 analysis). Over a third (39%) of zoos surveyed offered red panda encounters, with most (71%) being animal feeding experiences. Educational information was provided in almost all cases (95%) and focused on the encounter individuals and species' natural history. Of the 31 encounter red panda who were also part of a breeding program, 24 reproduced. Comparative data analysis suggested that encounter red panda produced more offspring and had higher longevity (survival) than non-encounter individuals, although this may reflect changes in red panda husbandry over time. A. f. styani were less likely to breed and produced fewer offspring than A. f. fulgens. Whilst there appears to be no major negative impacts of red panda encounters, continued monitoring and ensuring high animal-welfare standards remains vital.

Indexed as

AiluridaeAnimal HusbandryAnimals, ZooAnimal WelfareBehavior, AnimalAnimalsFemaleLongevityMaleReproductionambassador animalshuman‐animal interaction (HAI)reproductionsurvival

Identifiers

PMID41268941
PMCPMC13051758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.