Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268927›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Interplay Between Pulse Phase Duration and Inter-Phase Gap in the Assessment of Neural Health With Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.

Henk A Vink, Huib Versnel, Dyan Ramekers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Henk A VinkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Huib VersnelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Dyan RamekersDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFollowing deafness, a cochlear implant (CI) can be used for the restoration of hearing. CI effectiveness relies on the condition of the auditory nerve, which typically degenerates after deafness. The nerve's condition can be assessed with the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP), the whole-nerve response to an electric pulse. Changes in the eCAP following an increase in the inter-phase gap (IPG) of a biphasic pulse have been reported to be informative of neural survival. This IPG effect can be explained by the temporal separation of the hyperpolarizing phase from the depolarizing phase. We hypothesize that increasing the phase duration (PD) has a similar effect.

designWe investigated the PD effect in normal hearing and in ototoxically deafened guinea pigs (total N = 40) with various conditions of the auditory nerve by recording eCAPs to biphasic current pulses with alternating polarity and with varying PD and IPG. The eCAP data were obtained from both chronically and acutely implanted guinea pigs by using CI stimulation paradigms with a fixed charge and varying PD (30, 50, or 100 µs) and IPG (2.1 or 30 µs). We evaluated six eCAP measures: five derived from the amplitude growth function and the N 1 latency. We examined the relationships of PD and IPG effects with the survival of the spiral ganglion cells.

resultsThe PD effects were stronger for latency than IPG effects, but weaker for the other five evaluated eCAP measures. The PD effect did not correlate as well with neural survival as the IPG effect. The IPG effect decreased with increasing PD, and accordingly, the stronger correlations between the IPG effect and neural survival were found for a short PD. Notably, the latency increase with increasing PD was greater than 1, which indicates the second phase of the pulse significantly contributes to the eCAP. This second-phase contribution was larger for lower neural survival.

conclusionsThe PD effect of latency has predictive power in assessing neural survival. When using other eCAP measures than latency, the best approach to assess neural survival is using the IPG effect with a short PD (around 30 µs).

Indexed as

Action PotentialsCochlear ImplantsCochlear NerveDeafnessEvoked Potentials, AuditoryAnimalsElectric StimulationGuinea PigsAuditory nerveCochlear implantGuinea pigNeurodegenerationNeurostimulationPulse shape

Identifiers

PMID41268927
PMCPMC12904246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.