ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
Pharmacokinetic Model Selection for Personalized Infliximab Dosing in IBD.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetic Model Selection for Personalized Infliximab Dosing in IBD.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Toward adaptive therapeutic timing: integration of mechanistic pharmacology and artificial intelligence in precision dosing.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infliximab, a monoclonal antibody used for immune-mediated diseases, shows high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. Prolonged exposure increases the risk of adverse effects and costs, making dose personalization essential to balance safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Population pharmacokinetic models support individualized dosing, but different models may predict varying drug exposure for the same patient. This study aims to identify compatible models for each patient and assess the impact of model selection on dosing. This retrospective study included adult Crohn's disease patients receiving infliximab. Published pharmacokinetic models were screened. Model-patient compatibility was evaluated using Multivariate Exact Discrepancy through 100,000 Monte Carlo simulations. The Metropolis-Hastings algorithm generated individual parameter distributions. For each model-patient pair, the median and 90% confidence interval of the dose required to achieve a target exposure of 2079 mg*day/L were computed. Sixteen models were tested. No model was compatible with all patients. Dosing was calculated only for compatible pairs. The average median dose was 9.25 mg/kg, with an average imprecision of 6.63 mg/kg. The highest median dose reached 23.21 mg/kg, reflecting inter-model differences, while the greatest imprecision (25.69 mg/kg) stemmed from patient variability. This concentration-based method personalizes dosing via pharmacokinetic profiling. Patients can be classified into three groups: (1) those for whom all models provide similar recommendations, indicating high reliability across models; (2) those incompatible with all models, for whom the posology recommended by the manufacturer should be prioritized; and (3) those for whom some models are compatible but intensified therapeutic drug monitoring is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.