Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268897›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026

Pharmacokinetic Model Selection for Personalized Infliximab Dosing in IBD.

Sahira Chaiben, Peggy Gandia, Thibaut Jamme, Nicolas Congy, Didier Concordet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pharmacokinetic Model Selection for Personalized Infliximab Dosing in IBD.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sahira ChaibenINTHERES, University of Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7525-9650
Peggy GandiaINTHERES, University of Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-7894
Thibaut JammeClinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Reference Center for Inherited Metabolic Diseases, Federative Institute of Biology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Nicolas CongyInstitute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (I2MC), Team Cell Signaling in Response to Arterial Stress: Impact on Cardiovascular Diseases, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1297, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France.
Didier ConcordetINTHERES, University of Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3916-577X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infliximab, a monoclonal antibody used for immune-mediated diseases, shows high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. Prolonged exposure increases the risk of adverse effects and costs, making dose personalization essential to balance safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Population pharmacokinetic models support individualized dosing, but different models may predict varying drug exposure for the same patient. This study aims to identify compatible models for each patient and assess the impact of model selection on dosing. This retrospective study included adult Crohn's disease patients receiving infliximab. Published pharmacokinetic models were screened. Model-patient compatibility was evaluated using Multivariate Exact Discrepancy through 100,000 Monte Carlo simulations. The Metropolis-Hastings algorithm generated individual parameter distributions. For each model-patient pair, the median and 90% confidence interval of the dose required to achieve a target exposure of 2079 mg*day/L were computed. Sixteen models were tested. No model was compatible with all patients. Dosing was calculated only for compatible pairs. The average median dose was 9.25 mg/kg, with an average imprecision of 6.63 mg/kg. The highest median dose reached 23.21 mg/kg, reflecting inter-model differences, while the greatest imprecision (25.69 mg/kg) stemmed from patient variability. This concentration-based method personalizes dosing via pharmacokinetic profiling. Patients can be classified into three groups: (1) those for whom all models provide similar recommendations, indicating high reliability across models; (2) those incompatible with all models, for whom the posology recommended by the manufacturer should be prioritized; and (3) those for whom some models are compatible but intensified therapeutic drug monitoring is required.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseGastrointestinal AgentsInfliximabModels, BiologicalAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodPrecision MedicineRetrospective StudiesGastrointestinal AgentsInfliximabAI‐guided dosingCrohn's diseaseimmunopathologyinfliximabpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID41268897
PMCPMC12823319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.