Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268549›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Antibodies and cryptographic hash functions: quantifying the specificity paradox.

Robert J Petrella

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert J PetrellaDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Funding

CHARMM Modernization, Performance, and Continued DevelopmentR01GM103695 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BROOKS, CHARLES L · 2012 to 2018
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specificity of the immune response is critical to its biological function, yet the generality of immune recognition implies that antibody binding is multispecific or degenerate. The current work explores and quantifies this paradox through a systems analysis approach that incorporates set theoretic ideas and an application of structural and statistical modeling to prior experimental immunological and biochemical data. Order-of-magnitude estimates are computed for the average degeneracies and specificities of antibodies and epitopes using a chemico-spatial model for epitope diversity and a binary model for antibody-antigen binding. The results illustrate and quantify how the humoral immune system achieves both high specificity and high degeneracy simultaneously by effectively decoupling the two properties, similarly to programs in cryptography called secure hash algorithms (SHAs), which display the same paradoxical features. In addition, an antibody-epitope interaction probability model is used to help show how newly formed antibodies may avoid cross-reactivity with self-antigens despite their high degree of multispecificity and how the requirement of polyclonal binding likely improves the overall specificity of the immune response. Because they describe the relationships between various statistical parameters in humoral immunity, the models developed here may also have predictive utility.

Indexed as

AntibodiesAntibody SpecificityModels, ImmunologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsAntigen-Antibody ReactionsCross ReactionsEpitopesHumansImmunity, HumoralAntibodiesEpitopesadaptive immune systemantibodiesantigensdegeneracyepitopespolyreactivitypolyspecificityreceptors

Identifiers

PMID41268549
PMCPMC12627013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.