ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Tislelizumab-associated toxic epidermal necrolysis in an esophageal cancer patient: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sintilimab-induced delayed-onset toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient with gastric carcinoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tislelizumab, a humanized IgG4 anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody approved in China in 2019 for advanced solid tumors such as esophageal cancer, functions by blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway to reactivate anti-tumor immunity. Common adverse reactions include fever and rash; however, toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)-a rare, life-threatening drug hypersensitivity reaction-is reported in fewer than 0.1% of patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors, with limited real-world evidence specifically linking it to tislelizumab. Case presentation: A 70-year-old male with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma received two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy (nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and tislelizumab 200 mg) followed by partial esophagectomy. On day 86 after the first tislelizumab infusion, he developed a diffuse rash progressing to skin exfoliation, vesiculation, and a positive Nikolsky sign, leading to a diagnosis of TEN. Upon admission, his SCORTEN was 3 (predicting 35% mortality) and ALDEN score was 5, indicating a probable association with tislelizumab. Management included intravenous methylprednisolone, immunoglobulin, topical treatments, and nutritional support. The patient achieved complete recovery two months after symptom onset. Conclusion: This case illustrates that tislelizumab can induce TEN after a prolonged incubation period (86 days in this instance). It underscores the importance of vigilant monitoring of skin and mucous membranes during treatment, early recognition and intervention, and adequate glucocorticoid dosing in managing this serious immune-related adverse event, offering valuable clinical insight for oncologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.