Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268531›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

A Week-Long Departmental Scholarship Curriculum for Pediatric Subspecialty Fellows.

Amy Creel, Amanda Messer, Robin English

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy CreelLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5382-7489
Amanda MesserDepartment of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0877-824X
Robin EnglishLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3564-5266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Scholarly activity is a key requirement in pediatric subspecialty fellowship training. However, clear guidance on how to effectively support fellows in their scholarly endeavors remains limited. Objective: This study assesses the impact of a week-long departmental scholarship curriculum designed to enhance fellows' research competencies. Methods: In 2024, a curriculum was designed and delivered to first-year pediatric subspecialty fellows over 5 days, combining group learning sessions with individualized tasks. Pre- and post-curriculum surveys assessed fellows' confidence and knowledge across key scholarly domains. Daily session evaluations provided additional feedback. Fourteen fellows from 9 pediatric subspecialty programs participated. Results: All first-year fellows ( Conclusions: This week-long curriculum increased fellows' confidence in their scholarly abilities, highlighting the value of a structured, departmental approach to fostering academic engagement. While knowledge improvements were modest, the overwhelmingly positive evaluations support this curriculum approach as a potential model for enhancing scholarly activity in fellowship programs. Further research is needed to explore the long-term impacts on fellows' scholarly productivity and career development.

Indexed as

fellowshipmedical educationresearchscholarly requirementscholarship curricula

Identifiers

PMID41268531
PMCPMC12627373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.