Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268464›Full record

ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025

UK Parliament's antimicrobial resistance inquiry: translating evidence into crisis-resilient action.

Rasha Abdelsalam Elshenawy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rasha Abdelsalam ElshenawyDepartment of Medicine, School of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8954-0817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parliamentary inquiries play a crucial role in bridging scientific evidence and health policy. In response to the United Kingdom (UK) Parliament's Public Accounts Committee inquiry on antimicrobial resistance (AMR), this Viewpoint presents a 'crisis-resilient antimicrobial stewardship' model designed to sustain effectiveness during emergencies while strengthening routine performance. The model is organized around five interconnected pillars: digital innovation and diagnostics, One Health and environmental governance, workforce resilience and training, surveillance and data integration, and governance and policy alignment. Positioned within the global policy context of the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Union (EU), and the Sustainable Development Goals, it embeds equity, sustainability, and accountability. Aligning national reforms with international frameworks can enhance the UK's contribution to global AMR resilience and the 2030 Agenda.

Identifiers

PMID41268464
PMCPMC12628752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.